• O'Donnell
  • I'll be on that hill
  • Whiskey and Ice Cream
  • Ken Myers: The True and the Beautiful
  • Contact
  • © Copyright Notice
  • Menu

I'll be on that hill

Stuff I dig, stuff I think, stuff I've seen
  • O'Donnell
  • I'll be on that hill
  • Whiskey and Ice Cream
  • Ken Myers: The True and the Beautiful
  • Contact
  • © Copyright Notice
“

The study was done on land owned by Iowa State University called the Marsden Farm. On 22 acres of it, beginning in 2003, researchers set up three plots: one replicated the typical Midwestern cycle of planting corn one year and then soybeans the next, along with its routine mix of chemicals. On another, they planted a three-year cycle that included oats; the third plot added a four-year cycle and alfalfa. The longer rotations also integrated the raising of livestock, whose manure was used as fertilizer.



The results were stunning: The longer rotations produced better yields of both corn and soy, reduced the need for nitrogen fertilizer and herbicides by up to 88 percent, reduced the amounts of toxins in groundwater 200-fold and didn’t reduce profits by a single cent.



In short, there was only upside — and no downside at all — associated with the longer rotations. There was an increase in labor costs, but remember that profits were stable. So this is a matter of paying people for their knowledge and smart work instead of paying chemical companies for poisons. And it’s a high-stakes game; according to the Environmental Protection Agency, about five billion pounds of pesticidesare used each year in the United States.

”
— A Simple Fix for Farming - NYTimes.com (via ayjay)

October 22, 2012
Tags: land, food
Prev / Next

Wells Blog

Duis mollis, est non commodo luctus, nisi erat porttitor ligula, eget lacinia odio sem nec elit. Maecenas faucibus mollis interdum. Nulla vitae elit libero, a pharetra augue.


Latest Posts

You must select a collection to display.

Tweets